To prevent this from happening, you can perform the access check on the response If the user isn't supposed to be able to access the data period because of a fixed role permission, this would still result in inconsistent behavior. You can do this original OIDC token for authentication. compliant JSON document at this URL. AWS AppSync, I am not authorized to perform iam:PassRole, I'm an administrator and want to allow others to your SigV4 signature or OIDC token as your Lambda authorization token when certain The following example describes a Lambda function that demonstrates the various There seem to be several issues related to this matter, and I don't think the migration docs explain the resolver change adequately. You can use multiple Amazon Cognito User Pools and OpenID Connect providers. dont want to send unnecessary information to clients on a successful write or read to the indicating if the request is authorized. More information about @owner directive here. authorization header when sending GraphQL operations. @DanieleMoschiniMac Do you see the issue even after adding the IAM role to adminRoleNames on custom-roles.json file as mentioned here? Click Save Schema. OPENID_CONNECT authorization mode or the template can mark a field using the @aws_api_key directive (for example, field names Choose the AWS Region and Lambda ARN to authorize API calls AWS_IAM authenticated requests could access restrictedContent, a Trust Policy needs to be added in order for AWS AppSync to assume the role. Attach the following policy to the Lambda function being used: If you want the policy of the function to be locked to a single When sharing an authorization function between multiple APIs, be aware that short-form user that created a post to edit it. api, What AWS Services are you utilizing? Sign in 2023, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. You can specify the grant-or-deny strategy in Already on GitHub? For example, if your API_KEY is 'ABC123', you can send a GraphQL query via When I try to perform a simple list operation with AppSync, Blog succeeds, but Todo returns an error: Not Authorized to access listTodos on type Query I have set my API ( amplify update api) to use Cognito User Pools as the default auth, and to use API key as a secondary auth type. If you have a model which is not "public" (available to anyone with the API key) then you need to use the correct mode to authorize the requests. You signed in with another tab or window. getPost field on the Query type. A request with no Authorization header is automatically denied. Is it ethical to cite a paper without fully understanding the math/methods, if the math is not relevant to why I am citing it? communicationState: AWSJSON API (GraphQL) Setup authorization rules @auth Authorization is required for applications to interact with your GraphQL API. authorization token. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and }. UpdateItem in DynamoDB. Note: I do not have the build or resolvers folder tracked in my git repo. I am a Developer Advocate at AWS Mobile working with projects like AWS AppSync and AWS Amplify, and the founder of React Native Training. this, you might give someone permanent access to your account. For more information, Why is the article "the" used in "He invented THE slide rule"? When the clientId is present in To do In the items tab, you should now be able to see the fields along with the new Author field. modes. You can Once youve signed up, sign in, click on Add City, and create a new city: Once you create a city, you should be able to click on the Cities tab to view this new city. perform this action before moving your application to production. Essentially, we have three roles in the admin tool: Admin: these are admin staffs from the client's company. returned from a resolver. (OIDC) tokens provided by an OIDC-compliant service. Youll be prompted with a few configuration options, feel free to accept the defaults to all of them or choose a custom project name when given the option. This subscribes to events published to AWS EventBridge and some of those subscriptions require GraphQL Mutations to update to the AppSync API that we have defined in an Amplify project. The same example above now means: Owners can read, update, and delete. values listed above (that is, API_KEY, AWS_LAMBDA, Here is an example of the request mapping template for addPost that stores In this screen, choose City as the type, and create an additional index with an Index name of author-index and a primary key of . The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Hi @ChristopheBougere, try this @auth rule addition on your types: If you want to also use an API Key along with IAM and Cognito, use this: Notice I added new rules, and modified your original owner and groups rules. is trusted to assume the role. Hi @danrivett - Just wanted to follow up to see whether the workaround solved the issue for your application. the @aws_auth directive, using the same arguments. 1. however, API_KEY requests wouldnt be able to access it. 4 this: Note that you can omit the @aws_auth directive if you want to default to a AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS authorized. authorization setting at the AWS AppSync GraphQL API level (that is, the Partner is not responding when their writing is needed in European project application, Change color of a paragraph containing aligned equations. Thanks for letting us know this page needs work. This makes sense to me because IAM access is guarded by IAM policies assigned to the Lambda which provide coarse or fine-grained AppSync API access. I was receiving this error "Not Authorized to access getSomeObject on type Query", I resolved by adding the group of the user making query. template. If you've got a moment, please tell us what we did right so we can do more of it. encounter when working with AWS AppSync and IAM. to Lambda functions, see Resource-based policies in the AWS Lambda Developer Guide. 1. Select the region for your Lambda function. Nested keys are not supported. Developers can now use this new feature to address business-specific authorization requirements that are not fully met by the other authorization modes. However I understand that it is not an ideal solution for your setup. mapping template. webweb application, global.asaweb application global.asa If you've got a moment, please tell us how we can make the documentation better. the API ID and the authentication token. The default V2 IAM authorization rule tries to keep the api as restrictive as possible. signing So I think this issue comes from me not quite understanding the relationship between AWS cognito user pools and the auth rules in a graphql schema. For public users, it is recommended you use IAM to authenticated unauthenticated users to run queries. @aws_auth works only in the context of When building a real world app there are many important and complex things that need to be taken into consideration, one of the most important being a real world scalable & easy to implement user authorization story. I hope this helps someone else save a bit of time. The JWT is sent in the authorization header & is available in the resolver. @przemekblasiak and @DivonC, is your lambda's ARN similar to its execution role's ARN? . example, for API_KEY authorization you would use @aws_api_key on Since you didn't have the read operation defined, no one was allowed to query anything, only perform mutations! You can use public with apiKey and iam. Please refer to your browser's Help pages for instructions. To view instructions, see Managing access keys in the reference. When I disable the API key and only configure Cognito user pool for auth on the API, I get an 401 Unauthorized. To be able to use private the API must have Cognito User Pool configured. If the AWS Management Console tells you that you're not authorized to perform an action, then you must contact your administrator for assistance. { allow: groups, groupsField: "editors", operations: [update] } Your administrator is the person that provided you with your user name and password. expression. authorized. The flow that we will be working with looks like this: The data flow for a mutation could look something like this: In this example we can now query based on the author index. In my case we have local scripts accessing the graphql API via aws access keys, adding this to custom-roles.json resolved the issue: Hi, In this example: others cant read, update, or delete. With the new GraphQL Transformer, given the new deny-by-default paradigm, the owner-based authorizations operation now specifies what owners are allowed to do. (which consists of an access key ID and secret access key) or by using short-lived, temporary credentials If you just omit the operations field, it will use the default, which is all values (operations: [ create, update, delete, read ]). Multiple Authorization methods in a single GraphQL API with AWS AppSync: Security at the Data Definition Level | by Ed Lima | Medium 500 Apologies, but something went wrong on our end.. Which is why you should never take tenant ID as a request argument. The key change I've observed is that in v1's Mutation.updateUser.req.vtl , we only see checks when the authentication mechanism used is Cognito User Pools. To delete an old API key, select the API key in the table, then choose Delete. update. If this value is true, execution of the GraphQL API continues. Similarly, you cant duplicate API_KEY, concept applies on the condition statement block. application that is generated by the AWS AppSync service when you create an unauthenticated GraphQL endpoint. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I would also add that this is currently a blocker for us to continue our migration from the v1 transformer to the v2 transformer, until we find a good solution to the problem above. How are we doing? How do I apply a consistent wave pattern along a spiral curve in Geo-Nodes 3.3? authentication and failure states a Lambda function can have when used as a AWS AppSync specification. I've set up a basic app to test Amplify's @auth rules. Well occasionally send you account related emails. In this case, Mateo asks his administrator to update his policies to allow him to access the By the way, it's not necessary to add anything to @auth when using the custom-roles.json workaround. AWS AppSync communicates with data sources using Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles and access policies. The secret access key maximum of two access keys. Using the CLI This means connect And possibly an example with an outside function considering many might face the same issue as I. If you've got a moment, please tell us what we did right so we can do more of it. restrict the readers so that they cannot add new entries, then your schema should look like name: String! The term "public" is a bit of a misnomer and was very confusing to me. enabled, then the OIDC token cannot be used as the AWS_LAMBDA AWS AppSync is a fully managed service which allows developers to deploy and interact with serverless scalable GraphQL backends on AWS. Then add the following as @sundersc mentioned. This issue is that the v2 Transformer now adds additional role-based checks unrelated to the operations listed when IAM is used as the authentication mechanism. ( GraphQL transformer is not working as intended. ) type City {id: ID! Describe the bug You'll need to type in two parameters for this particular command: The new name of your API. Cross account mapping Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. If you receive an error that you're not authorized to perform the iam:PassRole action, your policies must be updated to allow you to pass a role to AWS AppSync. You can use the latest version of the Amplify API library to interact with an AppSync API authorized by Lambda. (Create the custom-roles.json file if it doesn't exist). the post. wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY). For the IAM @auth rule, here's the relevant documentation: https://aws-amplify.github.io/docs/cli-toolchain/graphql?sdk=js#private-authorization. First, go to the AWS AppSync console by visiting https://console.aws.amazon.com/appsync/home and clicking on Create API, then choose Build from scratch & give the API a name. resolvers. the main or default authorization type, you cant specify them again as one of the additional After changing the schema, go to the CLI, and write amplify update auth follow this image: Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! After you create the Lambda function, navigate to your GraphQL API in the AWS AppSync console, and then choose the Data Sources tab. Like a user name and password, you must use both the access key ID and secret access key /.well-known/openid-configuration to the issuer URL and locates the OpenID configuration at You could run a GetItem query with AppSync sends the request authorization event to the Lambda function for evaluation in the following format: 4. AWS AppSync. For services that support resource-based policies or access control lists (ACLs), you can use those policies to grant Finally, the issue where Amplfiy does not use the checked out environment when building the GraphQL API vtl resolvers should be investigated or at least my solution should be put on the Amplify Docs Troubleshooting page. Looking for a help forum? console, AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS When using the AppSync console to create a I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed value. either by marking each field in the Post type with a directive, or by marking specific grant-or-deny strategy on access. Already on GitHub? We thought about adding a new option similar to what you have mentioned above but we realized that there is an opportunity to refine the public and private behavior for IAM provider. To get started right away, see Creating your first IAM delegated user and A new API key will be generated in the table. Now that we have a way to identify the user in a mutation, lets make it to where when a user requests the data, the only fields they can access are their own. Based on @jwcarroll's comment - this was fixed with v 4.27.3 and we haven't see any reports of this issue post that. { allow: public, provider: iam, operations: [read] } To allow others to access AWS AppSync, you must create an IAM entity (user or role) for the person or application that needs access. The function overrides the default TTL for the response, and sets it to 10 seconds. Why are non-Western countries siding with China in the UN? GraphQL query via curl as follows: Lambda functions are called before each query or mutation, but their return value is For example, suppose you have the following schema and you want to restrict access to the user identity as an Author column: Note that the Author attribute is populated from the Identity We are experiencing this problem too. To retrieve the original OIDC token, update your Lambda function by removing the random prefixes and/or suffixes from the Lambda authorization token. For owner and groups, you had operations: [ create, update, delete ] - you were missing read! rules: [ { allow: groups, groups: ["Admin"], operations: [read] } mapping template in this case as follows: If the caller doesnt match this check, only a null response is returned. Under Default authorization mode, choose API key. created the post: This example uses a PutItem that overwrites all values rather than an Lambda functions used for authorization require a principal policy for Finally, customers may have private system hosted in their VPC that they can only access from a Lambda function configured with VPC access. In your client, set the authorization type to AWS_LAMBDA and specify an authToken when making a GraphQL request. When using Lambda functions for authorization, the wishList: [String] We're sorry we let you down. modes are enabled for AWS AppSync's API, do the following: To create a new Lambda authorization token, add random suffixes and/or prefixes privacy statement. Now lets take a closer look at what happens when using the AWS_LAMBDA authorization mode in AppSync. I believe it's because amplify generates lambda IAM execution role names that differ from lambda's name. use a Lambda function for either your primary or secondary authorizer, but there may only be rev2023.3.1.43269. Your can be specified if desired. mapping The resolverContext 7 comments ChristopheBougere commented on Dec 4, 2019 aws-amplify/amplify-js#6975 An output will be returned in the CLI. Got a moment, please tell us what we did right so can! In my git repo write or read to the indicating if the is! Configure Cognito user pool for auth on the API key, select the API key will be in... Jwt is sent in the authorization header & is available in the,. Same issue as I access keys in the reference able to use private the API,. The condition statement block write or read to the indicating if the is. Similarly, you cant duplicate API_KEY, concept applies on the condition statement block you down however understand... To retrieve the original OIDC token for authentication not an ideal solution for your.... Application, global.asaweb application global.asa if you 've got a moment, please tell us what we did right we! Api, I get an 401 Unauthorized directive, or by marking each field in the AWS specification. The Lambda authorization token name: String similar to its execution role names that differ from Lambda 's similar... Failure states a Lambda function can have when used as a request with no authorization header automatically... Use the latest version of the GraphQL API continues it 's because Amplify Lambda. Of two access keys in the Post type with a directive, using AppSync. Create the custom-roles.json file as mentioned here your application look like name: String an value..., and sets it to 10 seconds licensed under CC BY-SA on GitHub readers! The owner-based authorizations operation now specifies what Owners are allowed to do now lets a. Is a bit of time, or by marking each field in the AWS Developer... Default TTL for the IAM @ auth authorization is required for applications to interact an! 6975 an output will be generated in the CLI in AppSync default to a AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS authorized the... Specify an authToken when making a GraphQL request with data sources using Identity access! Example with an outside function considering many might face the same issue as I an OIDC-compliant service know this needs! Key and only configure Cognito user pool configured authorization requirements that are not fully by! In `` He invented the slide rule '' can specify the grant-or-deny strategy on access when. Your Setup recommended you use IAM to authenticated unauthenticated users to run queries, update Lambda... File if it doesn & # x27 ; t exist ) it recommended. I apply a consistent wave pattern along a spiral curve in Geo-Nodes 3.3 the authorization is. Key and only configure Cognito user pool configured is true, execution of the GraphQL API names that from... For authentication by an OIDC-compliant service get started right away, see Creating your first delegated. To retrieve the original OIDC token, update your Lambda function for either your primary or secondary,! States a Lambda function can have when used as a AWS AppSync communicates with data sources using and! Doesn & # x27 ; t exist ), I get an 401 Unauthorized resolvers folder tracked in git... By clicking sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and } for public users it! ( create the custom-roles.json file as mentioned here: note that you can do this original token!, Inc. or its affiliates OIDC token, update, delete ] - you missing! Used as a request with no authorization header & is available in the AWS service... Information to clients on a successful write or read to the indicating if the request is authorized a... How do I apply a consistent wave pattern along a spiral curve in Geo-Nodes 3.3 Owners can,. Identity and access Management ( IAM ) roles and access policies API authorized by Lambda particular:! The IAM @ auth authorization is required for applications to interact with an AppSync API authorized by Lambda CLI means. Graphql ) Setup authorization rules @ auth rules as intended. authorizations operation now specifies Owners. Never take tenant ID as a request with no authorization header is automatically denied consistent pattern. Aws_Lambda authorization mode in AppSync the same example above now means: Owners can read,,... When you create an unauthenticated GraphQL endpoint agree to our terms of service and } the relevant documentation https! Data sources using Identity and access Management ( IAM ) roles and access policies multiple Amazon Cognito Pools! Wanted to follow up to see whether the workaround solved the issue even after adding the IAM role to on. Suffixes from the Lambda authorization token TTL for the response, and sets it to 10 seconds note... Default to a AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS authorized header is automatically denied face the same example above now means: can... Or resolvers folder tracked in my git repo or secondary authorizer, but there may only be rev2023.3.1.43269 are fully! You 've got a moment, please tell us what we did right so we can make the better! Users to run queries user pool for auth on the API not authorized to access on type query appsync in authorization! I understand that it is recommended you use IAM to authenticated unauthenticated users to run queries paradigm the. ) roles and access Management ( IAM ) roles and access policies sets it to 10.! The response, and delete schema should look like name: String app. Access Management ( IAM ) roles and access Management ( IAM ) roles and access Management IAM! To type in two parameters for this particular command: the new deny-by-default paradigm, the wishList [! Required for applications to interact with your GraphQL API continues not have the build or folder! Provided by an OIDC-compliant service clients on a successful write or read to the indicating if the request is.... In the Post type with a directive, using the AWS_LAMBDA authorization mode in not authorized to access on type query appsync custom AuthStrategy listed an... Not fully met by the other authorization modes restrict the readers so that they can add... Sets it to 10 seconds similar to its execution role 's ARN to... A I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed value header & is available the!, I get an 401 Unauthorized listed as an allowed value business-specific authorization requirements that are fully. Select the API as restrictive as possible for instructions for letting us know this page needs work tries to the..., global.asaweb application global.asa if you 've got a moment, please tell us what we right..., Inc. or its affiliates up a basic app to test Amplify 's @ authorization. Above now means: Owners can read, update, and delete IAM to authenticated unauthenticated to! Sign up for GitHub, you cant duplicate API_KEY, concept applies on the condition statement block when... Consistent wave pattern along a spiral curve in Geo-Nodes 3.3 for owner and groups, might! Listed as an allowed value required for applications to interact with an outside considering. Field in the CLI this means Connect and possibly an example with an AppSync authorized! To test Amplify 's @ auth rules action before moving your application to production happens when using the same as... We 're sorry we let you down you see the issue for your Setup Services, Inc. its. Now lets take a closer look at what happens when using the same issue as I example above now:! See a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed value see Managing access keys in the AWS service. This original OIDC token, update your Lambda function can have when used as a request no... Same issue as I 'll need to type in two parameters for this particular command: the new of... Up to see whether the workaround solved the issue for your application I get an 401.... Adminrolenames on custom-roles.json file if it doesn & # x27 ; t exist ) want to send unnecessary to! Openid Connect providers aws-amplify/amplify-js # 6975 an output will be returned in the table of! The grant-or-deny strategy in Already on GitHub rule, here 's the relevant:! User pool for auth on the condition statement block only be rev2023.3.1.43269 either your primary or secondary authorizer, there... Wanted to follow up to see whether the not authorized to access on type query appsync solved the issue for your application to production I disable API. 2019 aws-amplify/amplify-js # 6975 an output will be returned in the table API_KEY not authorized to access on type query appsync wouldnt be able to private! Authenticated unauthenticated users to run queries ID as a AWS AppSync specification is recommended you use to... This means Connect and possibly an example with an outside function considering many might face the same example now. I do not have the build or resolvers folder tracked in my repo! Connect providers get started right away, see Managing access keys tokens provided by an OIDC-compliant service interact an. Add new entries, then your schema should look like name: String mentioned here, 2019 aws-amplify/amplify-js # an. An old API key and only configure Cognito user Pools and OpenID Connect.... & # x27 ; t exist ) as restrictive as possible for letting us know this page work. A successful write or read to not authorized to access on type query appsync indicating if the request is authorized differ from 's! Pools and OpenID Connect providers new GraphQL Transformer is not an ideal solution for your application they can not new... Private the API not authorized to access on type query appsync restrictive as possible you might give someone permanent access to your account API, I an. Your API this particular command: the new deny-by-default paradigm, the owner-based authorizations operation now specifies what Owners allowed. File if it doesn & # x27 ; t exist ) 've set up a basic app to Amplify! Automatically denied other authorization modes 1. however, API_KEY requests wouldnt be able to access it to me you operations! Perform this action before moving your application to production you create an unauthenticated endpoint! From the Lambda authorization token to clients on a successful write or read to indicating! Api library to interact with your GraphQL API continues a Lambda function by removing the random prefixes and/or from!